Author Topic: Ride Mag (Read 13764 times)

Tobyduke · **on:** July 23, 2015, 05:48:30 PM

What did people think of the Ride Magazine test ride this month.?

Welshman · **Reply #1 on:** July 23, 2015, 10:05:51 PM

It mirrored what I felt from my test ride.

RoadRunner · **Reply #2 on:** July 24, 2015, 12:17:37 AM

Is the article online yet?

Welshman · **Reply #3 on:** July 24, 2015, 09:20:44 AM

It is now:

RichS1000XR · **Reply #4 on:** July 24, 2015, 10:05:53 AM

Why are they quoting it as 158bhp, when EVERYONE else says it's 160bhp? Ride mag do have a habit of doing this; I wonder why?

Welshman · **Reply #5 on:** July 24, 2015, 01:13:12 PM

Originally Posted by RichS1000XR

Why are they quoting it as 158bhp, when EVERYONE else says it's 160bhp? Ride mag do have a habit of doing this; I wonder why?

Including BMW in the technical spec: "118 kW (160 hp) at 11,000 rpm"

Welshman · **Reply #6 on:** July 24, 2015, 01:13:31 PM

Originally Posted by RichS1000XR

Why are they quoting it as 158bhp, when EVERYONE else says it's 160bhp? Ride mag do have a habit of doing this; I wonder why?

Including BMW in the technical spec: "118 kW (160 hp) at 11,000 rpm"

Tobyduke · **Reply #7 on:** July 24, 2015, 03:03:24 PM

Not sure but that's bike mag rundown. one I saw is from this months ride magazine

RichS1000XR · **Reply #8 on:** July 24, 2015, 03:06:18 PM

Originally Posted by Welshman

Including BMW in the technical spec: "118 kW (160 hp) at 11,000 rpm"

They are fools. I want my 2bhp back!

I was surprised to see that adding the Akra silencer adds a whopping 0.8bhp! I'm still getting one though!

Welshman · **Reply #9 on:** July 24, 2015, 03:14:25 PM

Originally Posted by Tobyduke

Not sure but that's bike mag rundown. one I saw is from this months ride magazine

It is the Ride road test.

I posted the Bike road test in a separate thread.