Author [ES] [CA] [PL] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [DK] [NO] [GR] [TR] Topic: Intake Restriction  (Read 19282 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline merlin

  • XR Pro
  • ***
  • Posts: 386
  • Country: gb
  • Bike: S1000XR Sport SE
  • Town: Ilminster
Re: Intake Restriction
« Reply #60 on: October 06, 2018, 02:06:56 PM »
That's a very nice curve, probably more important than the top BHP figure - just what you want on the road.

Offline JTL

  • XR Pro
  • ***
  • Posts: 274
  • Country: gb
  • Bike: S1000XR Sport SE
  • Town: England
Re: Intake Restriction
« Reply #61 on: October 06, 2018, 04:01:53 PM »
*Originally Posted by Winger [+]
Did you find what you were looking for,long story short Akra headers/Mivv can/DNA filter/Power Commander.



Do you have the AFR on a full A4 page graph?  With a Y-axis range of 5-20 it's gonna look flat!  All my dyno graph AFRs have been scaled 10-17 or 18.
If not, he's fooled you  :034:

Offline Winger

  • XR God
  • *****
  • Posts: 2700
  • Country: gb
  • Town: Birmingham
Re: Intake Restriction
« Reply #62 on: October 06, 2018, 05:33:13 PM »
I don’t think they’d have Fooled me half as much as HT would have done and it was one of multiple dyno runs not as good as that but if you have had an X/R on a dyno i’m sure i’m Not the only one that is interested to see yours.

Offline bmwdream

  • XR Junior
  • *
  • Posts: 5
  • Country: us
  • Bike: 16 bmw s1000xr
  • Town: Portland
Re: Intake Restriction
« Reply #63 on: October 06, 2018, 05:43:55 PM »
Thank you for your dyno graph :002

Offline Triumphboy

  • XR Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
  • Country: gb
  • Bike: S1000XR SE
  • Town: Buckingham
Re: Intake Restriction
« Reply #64 on: October 06, 2018, 06:39:34 PM »
My two penneth worth that extra HP's are not worth looking for on this bike. I feel the chassis and suspension in particular, are not up to coping with much more. When I ride the bike hard I can feel it squirming around particularly on our shite roads.
Just my own view!

Offline Bree

  • XR God
  • *****
  • Posts: 2151
  • Country: gb
  • Bike: S1000XR
Re: Intake Restriction
« Reply #65 on: October 06, 2018, 07:29:27 PM »
   :0461:   :164: :164: :164:
Everything  Will Be Alright In The End, If Not Then Its Not The End.

Offline JTL

  • XR Pro
  • ***
  • Posts: 274
  • Country: gb
  • Bike: S1000XR Sport SE
  • Town: England
Re: Intake Restriction
« Reply #66 on: October 06, 2018, 07:43:45 PM »
*Originally Posted by Triumphboy [+]
My two penneth worth that extra HP's are not worth looking for on this bike. I feel the chassis and suspension in particular, are not up to coping with much more. When I ride the bike hard I can feel it squirming around particularly on our shite roads.
Just my own view!

I had a similar feeling - the rear shock was fck'ed!!

Offline Triumphboy

  • XR Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
  • Country: gb
  • Bike: S1000XR SE
  • Town: Buckingham
Re: Intake Restriction
« Reply #67 on: October 06, 2018, 08:09:38 PM »
I did wonder but I've just had one of the forks replaced and the other one has had the seals done so I'm loathe to suggest the rear shock at the moment. Going in again on Monday for the water pump which appears to be leaking! Goodwill warranty (Hopefully for the water pump too!)  :110:

Offline JTL

  • XR Pro
  • ***
  • Posts: 274
  • Country: gb
  • Bike: S1000XR Sport SE
  • Town: England
Re: Intake Restriction
« Reply #68 on: October 06, 2018, 08:19:27 PM »
*Originally Posted by Winger [+]
I don’t think they’d have Fooled me half as much as HT would have done and it was one of multiple dyno runs not as good as that but if you have had an X/R on a dyno i’m sure i’m Not the only one that is interested to see yours.

So you have been fooled, by half!  :038:

I've not had the XR on the dyno. Can't see the need, at my advancing years it would be a waste of money.

Offline Winger

  • XR God
  • *****
  • Posts: 2700
  • Country: gb
  • Town: Birmingham
Re: Intake Restriction
« Reply #69 on: October 06, 2018, 08:46:18 PM »
Oh right  :002: I show mine but you can’t show me yours  :164: